No Caption Needed is a book and a blog, each dedicated to discussion of the role that photojournalism and other visual practices play in a vital democratic society. No caption needed, but many are provided. . . .

May 16th, 2008

BUILT: Why Can't Bikes and Cities Just Get Along?

Posted by Hariman in built

BUILT explores the changing city in the US and the challenges that will affect housing, infrastructure, neighborhood cohesion, and equity in the coming years. BUILT is a series of research, installation, dialogue, interview, and performance events of varied scale, including the opportunity for public conversation offered at this blog.

This week’s discussion begins with this photograph:



City of Portland transportation workers install a new bike box at the corner of SE 7th Ave. and SE Hawthorne Blvd. made of thermal plastic and sealed onto the road with propane torches

Bike box and automotive thoroughfare: accommodation or tokenism? Cooptation or change?

Sign and reality, sign and system: what happens when public space becomes public signage?

BUILT is a performance/civic dialogue project and a collaboration of Northwesten University’s Theater Department & Portland, Oregon’s Sojourn Theatre, led by visiting artist Michael Rohd.

2 Responses to ' BUILT: Why Can't Bikes and Cities Just Get Along? '

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to ' BUILT: Why Can't Bikes and Cities Just Get Along? '.

  1. Tom White said,

    on May 16th, 2008 at 8:45 pm

    I once had a discussion with a friend I lived with in London. I was getting around by bike a lot (London streets are pretty good for cyclists!) and she wanted to start using her bike to get about but was afraid of motorists. Remember, I told her, that cyclists have as much right to use the roads as motorists. The picture above represents what lengths need to be gone to to point this out to road users. It is a shame because I found that cycling around a city was fast, healthy, environmentally sound, and a lot of fun. And maintaining a bike costs less a year than some people spend on petrol a week.

  2. Ehren said,

    on May 17th, 2008 at 8:10 pm

    I think it’s a little more complicated than that. American cities, and especially streets were not designed for the bicycle. So, as much right as a cyclist has to the roads, they are not designed to accomodate both cyclists and drivers. Furthermore, sidewalks were really designed for pedestrians and not cyclists. Therefore, to make bikes an actually viable form of transportation in America’s cities, signage such as this is necessary. But I don’t really see it as tokenism, or even accomodation, but re-design. Roads don’t need to say “this is a place for cars”; it’s just built into our psyche. So somehow, if one were to re-design cities to be bike friendly, they also need to re-orient the way we read space. The best way to do that is through signs. I think it is foolish for cities to assume roads are just as good for bikes the way they are. We need thorough signage and redesignation of space to make cities truly bike-friendly.

Leave a reply

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains images and excerpts the use of which have not been pre-authorized. This material is made available for the purpose of analysis and critique, as well as to advance the understanding of rhetoric, politics, and visual culture.

The ‘fair use’ of such material is provided for under U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Section 107, material on this site (along with credit links and attributions to original sources) is viewable for educational and intellectual purposes. If you are interested in using any copyrighted material from this site for any reason that goes beyond ‘fair use,’ you must first obtain permission from the copyright owner.