Oct 14, 2009
Mar 09, 2011
Oct 02, 2011
Sep 13, 2009
Aug 19, 2009
Jun 12, 2009

The Flags of Our Fathers

Fenway Flags2010-07-06 at 1.22.42 PM

I was at Yankee Stadium recently and as has been customary every since World War II, such sporting events begin with a standing salute to the “Star Spangled Banner—America’s national anthem.  During the seventh inning stretch, when one  expected to hear “Take Me Out to the Ballgame,” an announcer  implored all of the fans to stand facing in the direction of the American flag, to take their hats off, and to honor the singing of “God Bless America.”  This latest paean to American exceptionalism became a practice in New York after the tragic events of  9/11 and although it resulted in a law suit initiated by the NYCLU, it continues to the present day unabated. That said, such a flag fetish is not unique to New York, as we see in the  photograph of a red, white, and blue shrouded “Green Monster” in Boston’s Fenway Park on the Fourth of July.

There is of course nothing wrong in celebrating America’s heritage with displays of the flag, especially on the anniversary of our national “birth,” but notice here how the elongated flag (one of three U.S. flags in the photograph) is completely out of scale with its surroundings—both in size and dimension—as if to imply that there is nothing that can’t be covered by its reach.  Such hubris is accented by the military fly over and honor guard which frame the image across the diagonal from upper left to lower right. Though barely conspicuous in comparison to the magnitude of the flag, the martial presence in the image nevertheless emphasizes the normalization of a war culture in American life, even as the flag serves to articulate commitments to nationalism and militarism as if naturally and necessarily connected.

The relationship between nationalism and militarism is naturalized in no less subtle terms in this photograph of a young girl reaching for the flag that cloaked the coffin of her father, an Army Specialist recently killed in Afghanistan.

Flagsof Fathers.2010-07-06 at 1.20.35 PM

The child is absolutely beautiful; her skin soft and unblemished, her hair neatly combed into a pony tail, she exudes childlike purity and innocence. The expression on her face teeters between wonder and desire as receives the flag being handed to her from a member of the military honor guard. At some later date she might question with tears and anger why her father had to die in a war of occupation before she got to know him, but here her rapt attention is focused on the symbolic remnant that stands in simultaneously for his absence (as her biological father) and presence (as her national father), and she accepts it with open arms.  That she is dressed  in red, white, and blue only serves to accentuate the connection between the military hand offering her the flag and her own significance as a metaphorical representation of the nation.

The implication of these two images is no different than many more images regularly put on display in newspapers and website slide shows, and more is the pity, for the flag should be a symbol of patriotism—love of one’s country— and not an unguarded cipher for normalizing a military culture.

Photo Credits:  Elsa/Getty Images; Kelly Presnell/AP/Arizona Daily Star.

Cross-posted at BAGnewsNotes.

Share

The Flags of Our Fathers

Discussion

3 Responses

  1. david says

    Is the occasion of the Boston spectacle necessarily ‘militarism’, or could it be solidarity with our servicemen? Are the flag’s proportions hubristic, or defiantly jubilant? (Defiant, not only of circumstances, not only of policy; defiant also of certain rhetoricians and quibblers.) Could the fly-over represent our troops passing by, always on duty, doing the work of defense while we drink beer in the sun?

    Perhaps the death-flag given to the child represents a piece of what we are, without which we could not be. We are not normalizing a culture of militarism when we make a tiny symbolic gesture to show our love and gratitude to a grieving widow; we do it because she is in pain, and we are in pain, with her.

    I think you got a lot wrong in your commentary. Why and how could you be so wrong, wrong in an ideological way which is so common and so disastrous for the United States? Any symbolic unity, any sharing of spirit, it is immediately regarded as suspect, faces always, not sincere scrutiny, only practiced derision. That is the question I’m left asking myself after reading this weird piece. That, and what was the Specialist’s name.

  2. lucaites says

    David: The problem with your argument is that it operates with an assumption that the images actually defy: that we can somehow easily or effectively separate the “serviceman” from the “military.” We can’t, but the assumption makes it all too easy to dispose of any critique of a cultural militarism as a mere “quibble,” or worse, as a “disastrous” (unpatriotic?) attack on the men and women who protect us while we “drink beer in the sun”– as if patriotism were somehow tied to support of the military. Quite frankly, it is that position that I find the more pernicious and disastrous for a democratic society that relies on the possibility of unfettered dissent. And for the record, my critique is NOT of symbolic unity–much to the contrary–but of a pervasive, normalizing attitude that makes it impossible to separate our commitment to flag and nation from the military as if the only way to be patriotic is to support a normalized militarism.

    As to particulars. I am not at all sure that I follow your claim that the elongated flag in Fenway is more “defiantly jubilant” than hubristic, largely because there is nothing in the image that signals defiance of any sort. And I would agree that showing “our love and gratitude to a grieving widow” is a humane gesture that should be honored, but notice that in this image the flag is not being given to a grieving widow but to a child who shows no signs of grieving. Being wary of that is not “practiced derision” but sincere concern for the future of a nation that seems so easily to outreach its grasp.

  3. David Worthington says

    I am trying to work through distinctions between “Americanism,” American “nationalism” and “American Exceptionalism.” I think the God Bless America moment is indeed AE. The conflation of (christy) religion with national praise is clearly within the Reagan image of AE (though I’m not sure it is consistent with Toqueville, whose use of the term is not linked to a special relationship with a deity). The question for me is when does nationalism turn to exceptionalism? (By nationalism here, I am not thinking of jingoism, but rather a general and moderate pride in the nation, wanting the US to win in the World Cup or the Olympics, or being proud of where you are from). I think that as a nation we often Americanize (nationalize) ideas and material objects; but there is a point at which we cross over into exceptionalism and this is (or grey area) where reflexivity is lost. Thought is replaced by ritual and skepticism by dogma.

    I was in the Holocaust Museum in Washington DC last week, there is a temporary exhibit on Nazi Propaganda (an incredibly anti-rhetorical exhibit). In the comment book outside the exhibit visitors wrote only two types of comments. One, that the Nazi propaganda machine was horrible and is what the Obama administration is doing to us now, and, two, that Nazi propaganda is echoed in contemporary advertising and political campaigning. The point is, that the national discourse often fragments along these same love-it-0r-leave-it lines. The distinction between exceptionalism and national pride seems at times to be minute and at other points, a chasm.

    Dave

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.